India must revisit regulatory regime in fertilizer approval, says Yara’s MD Sanjiv Kanwar

Fertilizer corporations, that are managed by the federal government from manufacturing to gross sales and now even on earnings, hardly make an announcement on funding plan and after a very long time there was some capability enlargement in urea because of revival of closed public sector models. Amid the federal government’s modified priorities on use of chemical fertilizers, is the trade able to take the problem of serving to the nation meet foodgrains requirement after 20-30 years? businessline speaks to Sanjiv Kanwar, MD of Yara Fertilisers India. Excerpts:

There are plenty of talks about imbalanced use of fertilizer within the nation. What’s the answer do you see for this?

There must be an total evaluation on tips on how to enhance the stability within the system. It’s simple, as a result of after we take a look at the consumption that’s occurring, I believe it’s extra skewed in favour of nitrogen (N) and fewer in favour of phosphorous and potash (P&Okay) — urea costs (MRP) haven’t been elevated for the final 15-20 years and the hole between urea on one hand and DAP and sophisticated (NPK) on the opposite is kind of massive. So the farmer is mostly moving into for extra of urea as in comparison with the P&Okay fertilizers. Value coverage must be redesigned in order that farmers are pushed and inspired to maneuver within the course of balanced crop diet. That’s what may also assist go a good distance in bettering the soil well being of the nation.

There was a research about yield from fertilizer utility. Earlier from one bag of fertilizer, the manufacturing was once extra whereas it has declined from utility of identical one bag. That’s why farmers are utilizing extra chemical compounds. So, can there be a stability of each chemical fertilizer in addition to bio-fertilizer?

Completely. As we go ahead, local weather change is a actuality. Now we have seen it within the final 18 months. We didn’t have sufficient moisture in India. We didn’t have snowfall in north India, within the apple-growing area, and we didn’t have rains as we would have liked within the plains.

We have to have a mixture of mineral fertilizers and bio-fertilizers as a result of each have a job to play, particularly when it’s beneath stress circumstances. So if you apply a very good high quality of bio-stimulant, it helps the crop to battle the abiotic stress that it faces throughout excessive drought circumstances. That additionally helps in bettering or defending farm productiveness.

How is the farmer’s acceptability about bio-fertilizers? Due to subsidy, chemical fertilizers are cheaper whereas farmers have to pay extra for bio-stimulants.

It has been seen that if manufacturing is greater and folks have plenty of land, they’re able to undertake this type of crop vitamins. I believe we must always remember that the Indian farmer is a enterprise particular person. They take knowledgeable choices. If a product or an idea is making a distinction to bettering the farm productiveness, they may undoubtedly take a choice in favour of such an idea.

During the last 4-5 years, the bio-stimulant market has been rising in India together with the mineral fertilizers. So there may be an acceptance within the thoughts of the farmers to make use of higher high quality merchandise, higher high quality bio-stimulants which are obtainable.

How is the regulatory environment in India about approval of bio fertilisers?

I believe there’s a have to re-look on the regulatory system that we’ve got in place. There’s a World Financial institution report on ease of doing enterprise in agriculture, most likely launched in 2019, simply earlier than Covid pandemic. As per that report, India ranks 97 out of the 101 nations that have been surveyed on the time it takes to get new fertilizers registered in India beneath the Fertilizer Management Order. I believe it takes round 897 days as per the report back to get a brand new product registered in India, which is a really very long time. It’s truly stopping the Indian farmers from accessing revolutionary fertilizer merchandise which are obtainable to their friends within the world market.

For example, if we see one thing which is working very nicely in China, and we need to launch it in India, it can take me 3-4 years to carry it right here. And that’s the hole that builds up between my farmer in India and his friends within the world market, which must be bridged.

What’s the apply in developed markets?

All agriculturally superior nations have a common specification of fertilizers — minimal nutrient wanted and most contaminant accepted (no want to use for approval every time). So that’s how the standard of the fertilizer is assured. And it is extremely vital to keep watch over the heavy metals, that’s a contaminant, that ought to not go into the soil. There’s a common specification of fertilizers for water-soluble NPKs and it helped in rising grapes exports out of India.

It appears there’s a dilemma on the coverage degree, whom it ought to incentivise. These farmers who’re utilizing extreme chemical fertilizers, but additionally on the identical time contributing to the meals safety of the nation. Alternatively, farmers who don’t use chemical fertilizers, are additionally defending the soil of the nation. What’s one of the simplest ways to incentivise?

The perfect method is to take the center path. As a result of somebody who’s doing it proper, additionally must be incentivised. However, let’s say someone is utilizing imbalanced fertilizers. He must be incentivised to change in direction of balanced fertilizers. For example, improve the MRP of urea and no matter improve you’ve got right here, improve the subsidy on P&Okay and sophisticated, in order that total prices of manufacturing stay the identical, and the farmer advantages from that.

Is the fertilizer trade able to take a problem of assembly the meals manufacturing, contemplating that India’s inhabitants has been rising quickly?

I believe the trade is kind of nicely positioned to help progress in agriculture. We’re half and parcel of the agriculture sector in India. If we take a look at what’s occurring, the urea manufacturing has gone up nearly by 6 million tonnes, although principally by the general public sector. There’s additionally elevated manufacturing of phosphatic, advanced. There’s a want for enablers to come back in.

It’s not solely the backed fertilizers which have a job to play in bettering farm productiveness. You want the rules to permit simpler registration of newer fertilizers, bio-stimulants and liquid fertilizers, which is able to go a good distance in bettering farm productiveness. It’s not simply the urea and the advanced which may have an effect on farm productiveness.

There’s a part of farmers who don’t settle for the federal government’s declare that one bottle of nano urea is equal to 1 bag of granular urea. The perfect answer could be a mixture of each granular and the nano, however one can’t utterly cast off standard bag.

After we discuss nano-urea, we have to remember that it has come by means of a fairly rigorous testing course of. It has come by means of ICAR, which has examined it over a interval of 2-3 years. And it’s been launched into the market by a extremely revered fertilizer firm, IFFCO, which has been on the forefront of fertilizer manufacturing in India for the final so a few years now. And it’s a very severe participant. We shouldn’t be very fast to make any judgment name at any level of time, as a result of it takes about 3-4 years for a product to be established and accepted. It’s simply began.

Revealed on July 19, 2024



#India #revisit #regulatory #regime #fertilizer #approval #Yaras #Sanjiv #Kanwar